I was just experimenting with "Course Builder" and am perplexed by inconsistencies in the interface. With all the changes re the PIE, I'm not sure where to express these concerns. Do I add them as a feature request in the PIE? Do I include them here? Do I voice them to our SAM?
Anyway, this is my issue. Why doesn't the edit module experience in "Course Builder" match the edit module experience in the standard interface? Below, I have included the two interfaces indicating how they are similar but not quite the same. For instance, while "Dates" is available in both, "Release Criteria" is not. And in Course Builder, where I was expecting to see "Description" I see something called "Notes"…which seems of limited usefulness (relevant D2L Documentation).
For consistency's sake, my expectation is that users have access to the same "Edit Module" feature sets in both.
Standard Module Editing
Module Editing in Course Builder
Tags: UX, User Interface, consistency